Decode, validate and inspect JSON Web Tokens instantly. No data leaves your browser.
eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5c
| Claim | Value | Description |
|---|
Our comprehensive JWT Decoder Tool provides developers, security professionals, and system administrators with an essential utility for analyzing and understanding JSON Web Tokens. This sophisticated jwt parser enables instant decoding of any JWT token, revealing its complete structure including header, payload, and signature components. As a powerful jwt debugger, it validates standard claims, identifies potential security issues, and presents token information in a human-readable format. Best of all, it operates with complete privacy—all processing happens locally in your browser without transmitting any data to external servers, making it safe for examining sensitive authentication tokens.
A JSON Web Token (JWT) represents a compact, URL-safe standard for transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. Widely adopted across modern web applications, JWTs serve as the backbone for stateless authentication and authorization systems. The token structure consists of three distinct Base64Url-encoded segments separated by periods:
When you use our json web token decoder, you're essentially performing the reverse engineering of this structured format, transforming the compact string representation back into its readable JSON components for analysis and debugging purposes.
Our advanced jwt validator examines and categorizes all claims within your token, providing insights into their purpose and validity. Understanding these different claim types is essential for proper token implementation and security assessment.
These predefined claims are specified in the JWT RFC 7519 and represent the core metadata for any JWT token. Our jwt decoder validates and interprets each of these standard fields:
iss (Issuer): Identifies the principal that issued the JWT, typically the authentication server or identity provider.
sub (Subject): The principal that is the subject of the JWT, usually the user ID or unique identifier.
aud (Audience): Recipients that the JWT is intended for, preventing token misuse across different applications or services.
exp (Expiration Time): Unix timestamp after which the token is no longer valid—our tool calculates and displays the remaining validity period.
nbf (Not Before): Unix timestamp before which the token must not be accepted for processing.
iat (Issued At): Unix timestamp indicating when the token was issued, used for tracking token age.
jti (JWT ID): Unique identifier for the token, useful for preventing replay attacks through token blacklisting.
These are custom claims defined either in the IANA JSON Web Token Registry or using collision-resistant names (typically via URI namespacing). As a jwt token decode tool, we help identify these standardized custom claims that might include user roles, permissions, or application-specific data. Public claims are agreed upon by multiple parties using JWTs and follow naming conventions to prevent conflicts between different implementers.
These custom claims are created specifically for sharing information between parties that agree on their usage. Our jwt parser displays these private claims alongside standard ones, helping developers understand what application-specific data is embedded within tokens. Common examples include user preferences, session data, feature flags, or any other information needed by the consuming application without requiring additional database queries.
Our token decoder identifies and explains the signing algorithm specified in the jwt header, which determines how the token was cryptographically secured:
HS256/HS384/HS512: HMAC with SHA hashing (symmetric) - uses a shared secret for both signing and verification.
RS256/RS384/RS512: RSA with SHA hashing (asymmetric) - uses private key for signing, public key for verification.
ES256/ES384/ES512: ECDSA with SHA hashing (asymmetric) - similar to RSA but using elliptic curve cryptography.
PS256/PS384/PS512: RSASSA-PSS with SHA hashing - provides stronger security guarantees than standard RSA.
none: Unsecured JWT - contains no signature, should only be used in development or with additional transport security.
Our jwt debugger serves numerous critical functions across the software development lifecycle and operational security:
While our jwt validator helps identify issues, implementing proper security measures is crucial for protecting your applications:
Our token decoder implements several advanced features to provide maximum utility:
No, and this is intentional for security reasons. Our jwt decoder performs structural decoding and claim validation but cannot verify cryptographic signatures. Signature verification requires access to the secret key or public key, which should never be shared with third-party tools or external services. Always verify signatures using your application's secure key management system.
Our jwt token decode tool operates entirely client-side—no token data leaves your browser. However, exercise caution: while the tool itself is safe, anyone who can see your screen could view the decoded contents. Avoid using tokens containing highly sensitive information, and never use this tool with tokens that have access to production financial systems or contain personally identifiable information without proper authorization.
Decoding (what our tool does) extracts the Base64Url-encoded jwt header and jwt payload into readable JSON. Validation includes signature verification plus checking claims like expiration, issuer, and audience. Our jwt validator performs structural validation and claim checking but not cryptographic validation, which requires your private keys.
A proper JWT always contains three parts (header.payload.signature). If you encounter only two parts, it might be: 1) An unsecured JWT with "alg": "none" in the header (no signature), 2) A malformed or corrupted token, or 3) A different token format entirely. Our json web token decoder will identify and explain any structural anomalies in the token format.
The "Bearer" authentication scheme (RFC 6750) indicates that the accompanying token is a bearer token—anyone in possession of the token can use it to access protected resources. This underscores why secure storage and transmission are critical: stolen tokens grant immediate access. Modern implementations often supplement bearer tokens with additional protections like token binding or proof-of-possession mechanisms.
Access tokens should be short-lived (15-60 minutes) to limit exposure if stolen. Refresh tokens can be longer (days to months) but should be securely stored and rotated. Session tokens might align with user activity timeouts. Our jwt debugger helps you analyze existing tokens to understand current expiration policies and make informed decisions about appropriate token lifetimes for your specific security requirements.
Our jwt parser identifies the algorithm specified in the token header. Weak algorithms include: "none" (unsecured), "HS256" with a weak secret, or any deprecated algorithm. Modern implementations should use RS256, ES256, or PS256. We flag potentially weak algorithms and provide recommendations for more secure alternatives based on current cryptographic best practices.
JWT is the overall standard for JSON-based tokens. JWS (JSON Web Signature) provides the signing mechanism for JWTs. JWE (JSON Web Encryption) provides encryption for JWTs. Most authentication tokens are actually JWS-secured JWTs. Our token decoder handles all these formats and explains which type you're working with based on the token structure and contents.
Yes, JWTs are commonly used for session management in stateless architectures. However, they have limitations: tokens can't be easily revoked, they increase request size, and they expose session data to clients. Our jwt decoder helps analyze session tokens to ensure they contain appropriate claims and follow security best practices for session management implementations.
Use our jwt validator alongside these checks: 1) Tokens use strong algorithms (not "none" or weak HS256), 2) Expiration times are reasonable, 3) No sensitive data in payloads, 4) HTTPS is enforced, 5) Proper claim validation occurs server-side. Regular security audits with tools like ours help maintain secure JWT implementations throughout your application lifecycle.